User talk:CanonNi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''

Friendly reminder: it's currently 06:10, May 8, 2024 [refresh] where I live.
This means that if I don't reply to your message quickly, it's not because I'm ignoring you, I'm probably just asleep.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs)

Would you be interested?[edit]

Hello, CanonNi,
I don't know if you remember me, but we both participated in a discussion on the talk page of Black Sea slave trade, and I appreciated your effort in that issue (the problematic user has reappeared there, but I hope and trust they will not be succesful, since the matter seem settled). A similar issue has recently came up. Since you were interested in protecting Black Sea slave trade against attempts of bias, you may also be intrested in the talk page of slavery in al-Andalus; nothing has yet been done, but it likely will be.
A user who have shown what I believe to be bias have been allerted to the article: [1] The first user have adressed valid concerns which I have adressed, but M.Bitton have shown bias in other articles in this topic issue, and from what is said, I am concerned that this article will be subjected to bias editing. You will see my concerns on the article talk page. Since posting that, another user has allerted me that M.Bitton may have been on ANI for bias editing, but I do not know if that is true.
Perhaps you could be persuaded to put the article in your watch list, and adress future bias editing by M.Bitton? I would have done it myself, but I must be honest enough to say that my health is not good enough to engage in such a thing, and I have been blunt enough to explain why in the talk page. But I am still concerned enough to want to at least attempt to do something to protect the article. Of course, there is no need for any action at all at present; but since I know you to be interested in the subject, I would be grateful to know that a non-bias and serious contributor with respect for a non bias view had the article under watch. If you are not intereted, perhaps you can recomend another user to contact? Thanks. All the best,--Aciram (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aciram, and thanks for contacting me. I definitely do remember you, and I appreciate your great work. I will definitely monitor the article, and watch out to M.Bitton and other accounts. Thank you for trusting me, but to be honest, I believe that I'm not experienced enough to deal with things like this, and that my knowledge in the field is not enough to make decisions about the article's topic. I would recommend contacting active members of WikiProjects, such as WikiProject Human rights and WikiProject History. Again, thank you for contacting me, Aciram. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 11:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your kind words, and sorry for not answering before. I am relived that you have put the article on your watchlist.
In these situations I feel rather helpless; while I am confident in my knowledge about the subject matter, and I know that every citation written can be fact checked in the digitalized books by anyone without much concern, my main occupation on Wikipedia is to write, and I have less knowledge about which regulations to appeal to and who to contact in situations like these. The fact that I suffer from exhaustion also creates an inhibition to attend to such issues. I am therefore grateful when a user with more knowledge and energy can provide advise.
I understand your hesitance when it comes to the article subject; but nothing has yet occurred, and when and if it does, it is good to know that you, who in contrast to me will at least know who to contact, will be allerted. I am aware of my own limitations, but the non-bias principle is important to me, and I was aware of the sensitivy of the topic beforehand. This is a relief. Thanks again!--Aciram (talk) 22:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 23:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Teamfight Manager[edit]

Information icon Hello, CanonNi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Teamfight Manager, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up on draft submission declined[edit]

Hello, CanonNi. Good day to you. I would like to follow-up on my recent article submission which you have just declined. I'm hoping you would kindly shed light on the reasons why. Based on earlier feedbacks by other editors, I've made significant changes to insert independent and relevant external sources.

I believe the words used presently describe the company as a whole, and they are all factual instead of advertorial. Regarding a comment on COI, I have declared it on my profile and once again, the article draft is purely informational on the company. There are literally tons of big names/organisations out there with similar tone/language on their articles.

Don't mean to sound rude or anything, just curious how to proceed as best as I could because I noticed there are entries facing similar issues. Really appreciate any help I could get on this. Thank you so much. Looking forward to hearing from you. Stevienetto (talk) 06:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stevienetto. The reason I declined the draft is because there wasn't significant improvement since the previous decline. It seems that no new sources were added.
The draft needs more independent, reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Another issue is the external links in the draft. Please see WP:EXTERNAL and remove the links. Thank you for contacting me. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi CanonNi, thanks for replying. To be fair, the previous decline was solely talking about the COI aspect, which I feel doesn't make sense because isn't most articles are created from someone being invested in the subject/object to begin with.
Anyway, not sure how much more external sources I ought to add because most of them are available from the company and it's not "reliable" to be included. Any chance the latest edits are any better (have taken out many website links)? Once again, thank you for the help; appreciate some specifics given compared to the previous figures. Stevienetto (talk) 11:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest removing the external links in the body first, such as in the "History" section. In addition, a quick Google search has found many sources, such as this one and this one, so maybe consider adding some? The recent edits are definitely improvements, but more changes can be made. Thank you for asking! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 11:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there. Appreciate the feedback. Hope the new changes are good enough now. Do let me know your thoughts. Thank you so much for the help. Stevienetto (talk) 04:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I see that you have added new sources and removed external links, which is great. If you're ready, you could resubmit the draft for review, and another editor will take a look at the draft shortly. (I won't review the draft myself, as I also contributed to it) '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 04:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Once again, thank you so much for your help. Cheers! Stevienetto (talk) 04:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there. Sorry to bother you, just that you're the only one who has been kind and helpful so far. Apparently the draft has been declined and at this point I'm just so lost and frustrated about the whole process. Feels like every editor/reviewer has their own standards and it's impossible to tick all the boxes, hence a never-ending cycle.
Am wondering if there's a possibility a different editor overseeing my draft instead of the same person if I were to submit without any changes (since I genuinely don't know what else is there to add on)? I apologise for the troubles. Stevienetto (talk) 06:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand how you feel. Consider asking about the draft at WP:AFC/HD, where other editors can look at the draft and give suggestions. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted[edit]

Hi CanonNi, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 12:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2409:40E2:2013:CDB4:8000:0:0:0[edit]

That's an LTA – see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Master12112wp. Hindi and Odia profanity spam are what they do, and when you leave messages on their talk page it probably adds fuel to the fire; also, don't edit war with them by reverting more than three times. Codename Noreste 🤔 La Suma 05:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I won't warn or edit-war with them then. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you![edit]

thanks for your contributions! :) xRozuRozu (t • c) 20:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Your contributions are great as well! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 23:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[edit]

Hi CanonNi. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
  • Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Fastily 05:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Hi. I have already explained in my first edit that the text in “LGBT people annd Islam” are outdated sources, and that there should be reliable sources cited. It was not a mistake, and I explained why I made the edits. I think you made a mistake. Please revert your edits. Thank you. ElephantMario (talk) 11:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, sorry! I've self-reverted. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 12:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please re-revert you were correct to revert elephantmario. The sources are still accurate in fact the constitution has not eliminated the death penalty for homosexual relations under Sharia, and ElephantMario is an alt of BalloonMario, who is a banned alt of another user. 2604:2DC0:101:200:0:0:0:1B1D (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. You are a sock puppet account of Jacobkennedy. ElephantMario (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Fastily 21:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 22:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Userpage Barnstar
I like your user page Akhinesh212

Akhinesh212 (talk) 17:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Your user page is awesome too! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 00:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi CanonNi. Thank you for your work on Revolutionary Workers Party – Mindanao. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 03:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CanonNi&oldid=1222777221"